Insurance rates based on credit score: why state lawmakers are pushing back
A typical homeowner with a low credit score pays about $1,996 more a year for homeowners insurance than an otherwise similar neighbor with strong credit, according to Consumer Federation of America research published in August 2025. That is not a small pricing quirk. It is close to a second policy.
Credit-based insurance scores are used in homeowners and auto insurance across most of the country, the Insurance Information Institute has documented. And the U.S. Treasury’s Federal Insurance Office said in January 2025 that state regulators and other market participants are reviewing those proxy factors, including whether their use limits economic mobility.
That combination has turned a technical underwriting tool into a statehouse fight. The question now is whether insurance rates based on credit score are a fair way to price risk, or just an especially tidy way to make some homeowners pay more for the same coverage.
How credit history affects home insurance premiums
Video of the Day
The CFA’s Penalized brief says the typical homeowner with low credit pays $1,996 more each year than a comparable homeowner with high credit, a difference of almost 99 percent. The report used ZIP-code-level premium data purchased from Quadrant Information Services, so this is a calculated premium study, not an actuarial audit.
The penalty does not stop with the lowest-credit households. Homeowners with medium credit scores, roughly equivalent to a 740 FICO, still pay an extra $792 a year, or 39 percent more than customers with high credit scores, the CFA said in August 2025.
The pain is spread unevenly, too. In 23 states, homeowners with low credit scores pay at least twice as much as those with high credit, according to the same CFA release. Pennsylvania, Arizona, Oregon and West Virginia face the largest penalty, the CFA’s report says.
For critics, that is the heart of the problem. A pricing factor that can nearly double a premium ought to be doing more than hanging around in the model because it has always been there.
Video of the Day
When credit outweighs flood zones and fire exposure
The CFA says the pricing gap can outweigh disaster risk itself. On average, a homeowner with low credit in the safest 1 percent of ZIP codes by disaster risk pays about the same premium as an otherwise identical homeowner with high credit in the 71st percentile of disaster risk, according to the group’s August 2025 release.
That matters because insurers often defend premium changes as a signal about climate exposure. If credit standing can swamp that signal, critics argue, the price tag is no longer tracking the thing insurers say it tracks.
CFA frames the practice as part of a broader pattern of insurance discrimination, and makes one point that is hard to brush aside: insurers do not extend credit. If a customer stops paying, coverage ends. That is a different relationship from a bank loan, which is why critics keep asking why creditworthiness should determine the cost of the underlying policy at all.
The broader argument is not really about convenience. It is about whether a factor borrowed from consumer finance has become a stand-in for something insurers have not made public.
Why lawmakers are scrutinizing insurance rates based on credit score
Federal regulators have already put the issue on paper. The FIO said in its January 2025 report that the NAIC, state insurance regulators and some market participants are reviewing proxy factors such as credit history, education, gender and marital status in personal auto insurance, and whether those factors limit consumers’ economic mobility.
That does not amount to a federal ban. It does signal that the question is no longer confined to consumer advocates and a few restless state capitols.
Three states have already barred the use of credit in homeowners insurance pricing: California, Maryland and Massachusetts, according to the CFA’s August 2025 release. The FIO report separately says some state legislatures have prohibited or limited credit-based insurance scores more broadly.
CFA and the Climate and Community Institute are pressing remaining states to follow suit. Their ask is straightforward: stop insurers from using credit scores and credit history in homeowners pricing, and require public disclosures that show how pricing models work, the CFA said in August 2025.
The industry’s defense
Insurers say credit data belongs in the model because it helps predict claims. The Insurance Information Institute says actuarial studies suggest that how people manage their finances can be a meaningful predictor of whether they will file claims, which is the industry’s standard defense for using credit-based insurance scores.
There is also a distributional wrinkle that gets lost in the shouting. A 2017 Arkansas insurance department review cited by the III examined 3.4 million personal-lines policies and found that credit information lowered premiums in nearly 55 percent of cases, raised them in 19.8 percent, and had no effect in 25.7 percent. Policies with decreases outnumbered those with increases by 2.76 to 1.
That does not settle the fairness question. The Arkansas review is old, limited to one state, and does not answer the harder issue at the center of this debate: whether credit is genuinely predictive of loss, or whether it mostly acts as a proxy for traits and circumstances that insurers would rather not name out loud.
The industry can point to statistical correlation. Critics point to unequal outcomes and ask whether correlation is enough.
For now, that is where the fight sits. The pricing model is still in place in most states, but lawmakers, regulators and consumer groups are now arguing over whether it survives because it works, or because nobody has forced the industry to explain it better.